Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a class of timepieces that is normally employed for even ten per cent of its potential.
What's it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has secured his wrist to the max after a dip along with a few strokes, return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use it's only the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back to the center of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the group can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film additionally winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other without the crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everyone.
These are only two of the first cases that reveal how - fiction or reality - for more than fifty years the media - driven by the watch sector - determined that the diver watches ought to be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Maybe it is also from that day the manufacturers when it came to describing their versions started to use the phrase: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 change, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanisms of the most well-known spy in the world, and obviously also the watch whose role was played with the Omega Seamaster for many decades.
But beyond their real use in this large family whose roots would only have to deal with "hard greater than steel", today there are also models so bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the palms.
However, a true diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the features and constructive philosophies of these references.
I've a long-standing friend who's an expert diver and who, during his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - including that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to guarantee these performances:
Fantastic visibility during the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
However, the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches need to adhere to certain rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal usage, what we all know is the greatest, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to provide features much milder and easier to handle.
I recall that in order to only immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but this is not so when it is done a trivial swim at the sea. It would be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely on a screw-on crown, better still when secure on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the watertight status of the submerged timepieces?
Just for those who would use them for specialist purposes the ideal is to be able to rely on a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is consequently at a blatant state of non-security.
Unfortunately, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dip watch may have to be rushed to a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism forever. This function currently exists, however on hardly any models, which frankly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have forgotten to screw the crown tightly. It's the most frequent case.
TIP - When you've worn the costume pick on the fly : either leave your diver somewhere safe or obligatorily create a closing but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of get more info issues related to the time that must meet with the water, and also given the essential information, I show you which - at least so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've split them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear does not represent any position.